Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Bakersfield
This post compares Redlands, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Redlands (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 70,765 | 372,680 |
Income (median) | $54,151 | $44,447 |
Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $228,400 |
White | 71% | 68% |
Black | 7% | 7% |
Asian | 7% | 7% |
With Kids | 33% | 45% |
Age (median) | 35 | 30 |
Rentals | 42% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Bakersfield?
A: Redlands has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 70765 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 42% for Redlands versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z