Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redlands to Alameda
This post compares Redlands, California to Alameda, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redlands (city) | Alameda (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 70,765 | 78,246 |
| Income (median) | $54,151 | $71,080 |
| Home Value (median) | $350,900 | $729,100 |
| White | 71% | 48% |
| Black | 7% | 7% |
| Asian | 7% | 31% |
| With Kids | 33% | 31% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 41 |
| Rentals | 42% | 53% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redlands or Alameda?
A: Redlands has a similar population count than Alameda: 70765 compared with 78246 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redlands or in Alameda?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Redlands.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redlands or Alameda?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Redlands.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Alameda does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 42% for Redlands versus 53% for Alameda.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redlands may include: Vacaville, Ridgecrest, and Oceanside.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z