Compare-Cities.com
Compare Redding to South San Francisco
This post compares Redding, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Redding (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 91,236 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $41,458 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $245,100 | $697,400 |
| White | 84% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 39% |
| With Kids | 27% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 38 | 39 |
| Rentals | 47% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Redding or South San Francisco?
A: Redding has a larger population count than South San Francisco: 91236 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Redding or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Redding.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Redding or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Redding.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Redding does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 47% for Redding versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Redding may include: Citrus-Heights, South-Lake-Tahoe, and Winter-Gardens.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z