Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Palos Verdes to South San Francisco
This post compares Rancho Palos Verdes, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Palos Verdes (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 42,463 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $100,478 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,051,000 | $697,400 |
| White | 60% | 33% |
| Black | 1% | 2% |
| Asian | 28% | 39% |
| With Kids | 30% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 49 | 39 |
| Rentals | 20% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Palos Verdes or South San Francisco?
A: Rancho Palos Verdes has a smaller population count than South San Francisco: 42463 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Palos Verdes or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Rancho Palos Verdes.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Palos Verdes or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Rancho Palos Verdes.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 20% for Rancho Palos Verdes versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Palos Verdes may include: La-Caada-Flintridge, Pleasanton, and North-Tustin.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z