Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Palos Verdes to South Pasadena
This post compares Rancho Palos Verdes, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Palos Verdes (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 42,463 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $100,478 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $1,051,000 | $928,500 |
| White | 60% | 54% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 28% | 29% |
| With Kids | 30% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 49 | 40 |
| Rentals | 20% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Palos Verdes or South Pasadena?
A: Rancho Palos Verdes has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 42463 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Palos Verdes or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Rancho Palos Verdes.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Palos Verdes or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Rancho Palos Verdes.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 20% for Rancho Palos Verdes versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Palos Verdes may include: La-Caada-Flintridge, Pleasanton, and North-Tustin.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z