Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $322,800 |
| White | 62% | 36% |
| Black | 9% | 1% |
| Asian | 13% | 10% |
| With Kids | 39% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 32 |
| Rentals | 38% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or South San Jose Hills?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a much larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 174573 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rancho Cucamonga does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z