Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to South Pasadena
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $928,500 |
| White | 62% | 54% |
| Black | 9% | 3% |
| Asian | 13% | 29% |
| With Kids | 39% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 40 |
| Rentals | 38% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or South Pasadena?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a much larger population count than South Pasadena: 174573 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z