Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to South Lake Tahoe
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to South Lake Tahoe, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | South Lake Tahoe (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 21,680 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $40,695 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $374,600 |
| White | 62% | 81% |
| Black | 9% | 1% |
| Asian | 13% | 3% |
| With Kids | 39% | 23% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 38 |
| Rentals | 38% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a much larger population count than South Lake Tahoe: 174573 compared with 21680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in South Lake Tahoe?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or South Lake Tahoe?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Lake Tahoe does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 54% for South Lake Tahoe.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z