Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to South El Monte
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $389,400 |
| White | 62% | 59% |
| Black | 9% | 0% |
| Asian | 13% | 14% |
| With Kids | 39% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 34 |
| Rentals | 38% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or South El Monte?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a much larger population count than South El Monte: 174573 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South El Monte does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z