Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to San Francisco
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $927,400 |
| White | 62% | 47% |
| Black | 9% | 5% |
| Asian | 13% | 34% |
| With Kids | 39% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 38 |
| Rentals | 38% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or San Francisco?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 174573 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z