Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to San Bruno
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to San Bruno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | San Bruno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 43,105 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $61,645 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $754,700 |
| White | 62% | 49% |
| Black | 9% | 1% |
| Asian | 13% | 28% |
| With Kids | 39% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 39 |
| Rentals | 38% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or San Bruno?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a much larger population count than San Bruno: 174573 compared with 43105 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in San Bruno?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or San Bruno?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Bruno does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 44% for San Bruno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z