Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 34,662 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $77,000 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $633,400 |
| White | 62% | 75% |
| Black | 9% | 1% |
| Asian | 13% | 13% |
| With Kids | 39% | 29% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 39 |
| Rentals | 38% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or Pleasant Hill?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a much larger population count than Pleasant Hill: 174573 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pleasant Hill does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z