Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to Pico Rivera
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to Pico Rivera, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | Pico Rivera (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 63,750 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $36,529 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $380,200 |
| White | 62% | 55% |
| Black | 9% | 0% |
| Asian | 13% | 3% |
| With Kids | 39% | 42% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 36 |
| Rentals | 38% | 33% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or Pico Rivera?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a larger population count than Pico Rivera: 174573 compared with 63750 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in Pico Rivera?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or Pico Rivera?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rancho Cucamonga does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 33% for Pico Rivera.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z