Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to Pasadena
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $689,700 |
| White | 62% | 53% |
| Black | 9% | 10% |
| Asian | 13% | 16% |
| With Kids | 39% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 37 |
| Rentals | 38% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or Pasadena?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a similar population count than Pasadena: 174573 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z