Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to Palo Alto
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to Palo Alto, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | Palo Alto (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 67,082 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $124,900 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $1,989,300 |
| White | 62% | 61% |
| Black | 9% | 1% |
| Asian | 13% | 31% |
| With Kids | 39% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 41 |
| Rentals | 38% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or Palo Alto?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a larger population count than Palo Alto: 174573 compared with 67082 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in Palo Alto?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or Palo Alto?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palo Alto does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 45% for Palo Alto.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z