Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to Palm Springs
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $340,600 |
| White | 62% | 83% |
| Black | 9% | 4% |
| Asian | 13% | 4% |
| With Kids | 39% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 54 |
| Rentals | 38% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or Palm Springs?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a larger population count than Palm Springs: 174573 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Palm Springs does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z