Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to La Verne
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to La Verne, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | La Verne (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 32,320 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $57,816 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $535,900 |
| White | 62% | 74% |
| Black | 9% | 4% |
| Asian | 13% | 7% |
| With Kids | 39% | 30% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 43 |
| Rentals | 38% | 25% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or La Verne?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a much larger population count than La Verne: 174573 compared with 32320 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in La Verne?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or La Verne?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Rancho Cucamonga does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 25% for La Verne.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z