Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to Irvine
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to Irvine, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | Irvine (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 256,877 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $81,453 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $753,400 |
| White | 62% | 47% |
| Black | 9% | 1% |
| Asian | 13% | 41% |
| With Kids | 39% | 35% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 34 |
| Rentals | 38% | 51% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or Irvine?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a smaller population count than Irvine: 174573 compared with 256877 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in Irvine?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or Irvine?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Irvine does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 51% for Irvine.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z