Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to Fresno
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to Fresno, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | Fresno (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 519,037 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $39,069 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $206,800 |
| White | 62% | 56% |
| Black | 9% | 7% |
| Asian | 13% | 13% |
| With Kids | 39% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 30 |
| Rentals | 38% | 53% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or Fresno?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a much smaller population count than Fresno: 174573 compared with 519037 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in Fresno?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or Fresno?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fresno does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 53% for Fresno.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z