Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to Foster City
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | Foster City (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 174,573 | 33,529 |
Income (median) | $56,814 | $105,889 |
Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $1,051,000 |
White | 62% | 43% |
Black | 9% | 2% |
Asian | 13% | 47% |
With Kids | 39% | 33% |
Age (median) | 35 | 40 |
Rentals | 38% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or Foster City?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a much larger population count than Foster City: 174573 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foster City does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z