Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to Foothill Farms
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $201,200 |
| White | 62% | 67% |
| Black | 9% | 9% |
| Asian | 13% | 5% |
| With Kids | 39% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 33 |
| Rentals | 38% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or Foothill Farms?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a much larger population count than Foothill Farms: 174573 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z