Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to Fairfield
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to Fairfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | Fairfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 112,790 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $51,969 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $341,500 |
| White | 62% | 46% |
| Black | 9% | 14% |
| Asian | 13% | 17% |
| With Kids | 39% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 34 |
| Rentals | 38% | 44% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or Fairfield?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a larger population count than Fairfield: 174573 compared with 112790 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in Fairfield?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or Fairfield?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Fairfield does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 44% for Fairfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z