Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to Burbank
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $574,300 |
| White | 62% | 70% |
| Black | 9% | 2% |
| Asian | 13% | 11% |
| With Kids | 39% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 39 |
| Rentals | 38% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or Burbank?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a larger population count than Burbank: 174573 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z