Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to Beverly Hills
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 62% | 82% |
| Black | 9% | 1% |
| Asian | 13% | 9% |
| With Kids | 39% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 43 |
| Rentals | 38% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or Beverly Hills?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a much larger population count than Beverly Hills: 174573 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z