Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to Belmont
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to Belmont, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | Belmont (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 174,573 | 27,110 |
Income (median) | $56,814 | $107,466 |
Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $1,174,200 |
White | 62% | 62% |
Black | 9% | 1% |
Asian | 13% | 27% |
With Kids | 39% | 32% |
Age (median) | 35 | 39 |
Rentals | 38% | 40% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or Belmont?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a much larger population count than Belmont: 174573 compared with 27110 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in Belmont?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or Belmont?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Belmont does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 40% for Belmont.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z