Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to Bakersfield
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to Bakersfield, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | Bakersfield (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 372,680 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $44,447 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $228,400 |
| White | 62% | 68% |
| Black | 9% | 7% |
| Asian | 13% | 7% |
| With Kids | 39% | 45% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 30 |
| Rentals | 38% | 43% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or Bakersfield?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a much smaller population count than Bakersfield: 174573 compared with 372680 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in Bakersfield?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or Bakersfield?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Bakersfield does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 43% for Bakersfield.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z