Compare-Cities.com
Compare Rancho Cucamonga to Atwater
This post compares Rancho Cucamonga, California to Atwater, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Rancho Cucamonga (city) | Atwater (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 174,573 | 29,118 |
| Income (median) | $56,814 | $35,415 |
| Home Value (median) | $444,200 | $179,400 |
| White | 62% | 58% |
| Black | 9% | 3% |
| Asian | 13% | 4% |
| With Kids | 39% | 48% |
| Age (median) | 35 | 30 |
| Rentals | 38% | 49% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Rancho Cucamonga or Atwater?
A: Rancho Cucamonga has a much larger population count than Atwater: 174573 compared with 29118 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Rancho Cucamonga or in Atwater?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga or Atwater?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Rancho Cucamonga.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Atwater does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 38% for Rancho Cucamonga versus 49% for Atwater.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Rancho Cucamonga may include: Vacaville, Corona, and La-Presa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z