Compare-Cities.com
Compare Ramona to Beverly Hills
This post compares Ramona, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Ramona (CDP) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,871 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $46,596 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $434,600 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 81% | 82% |
| Black | 1% | 1% |
| Asian | 2% | 9% |
| With Kids | 36% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 37 | 43 |
| Rentals | 33% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Ramona or Beverly Hills?
A: Ramona has a smaller population count than Beverly Hills: 21871 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Ramona or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Ramona.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Ramona or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Ramona.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 33% for Ramona versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Ramona may include: Santee, Lakeside, and Yucaipa.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z