Compare-Cities.com
Compare Prunedale to Foothill Farms
This post compares Prunedale, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Prunedale (CDP) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
---|---|---|
Population | 20,928 | 33,627 |
Income (median) | $46,463 | $39,925 |
Home Value (median) | $451,300 | $201,200 |
White | 64% | 67% |
Black | 1% | 9% |
Asian | 3% | 5% |
With Kids | 38% | 38% |
Age (median) | 37 | 33 |
Rentals | 25% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Prunedale or Foothill Farms?
A: Prunedale has a smaller population count than Foothill Farms: 20928 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Prunedale or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Prunedale.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Prunedale or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Prunedale.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 25% for Prunedale versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Prunedale may include: Windsor, Pico-Rivera, and Wildomar.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z