Compare-Cities.com
Compare Porterville to South San Jose Hills
This post compares Porterville, California to South San Jose Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Porterville (city) | South San Jose Hills (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,782 | 20,423 |
| Income (median) | $36,312 | $31,494 |
| Home Value (median) | $163,100 | $322,800 |
| White | 77% | 36% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 10% |
| With Kids | 48% | 54% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 32 |
| Rentals | 46% | 28% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Porterville or South San Jose Hills?
A: Porterville has a larger population count than South San Jose Hills: 58782 compared with 20423 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Porterville or in South San Jose Hills?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Porterville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Porterville or South San Jose Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Porterville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Porterville versus 28% for South San Jose Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Porterville may include: Calexico, Sanger, and Tulare.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z