Compare-Cities.com
Compare Porterville to South El Monte
This post compares Porterville, California to South El Monte, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Porterville (city) | South El Monte (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,782 | 20,712 |
| Income (median) | $36,312 | $28,039 |
| Home Value (median) | $163,100 | $389,400 |
| White | 77% | 59% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 14% |
| With Kids | 48% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 34 |
| Rentals | 46% | 52% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Porterville or South El Monte?
A: Porterville has a larger population count than South El Monte: 58782 compared with 20712 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Porterville or in South El Monte?
A: Incomes are on average higher in Porterville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Porterville or South El Monte?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Porterville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South El Monte does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Porterville versus 52% for South El Monte.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Porterville may include: Calexico, Sanger, and Tulare.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z