Compare-Cities.com
Compare Porterville to San Marcos
This post compares Porterville, California to San Marcos, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Porterville (city) | San Marcos (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,782 | 93,493 |
| Income (median) | $36,312 | $50,338 |
| Home Value (median) | $163,100 | $455,700 |
| White | 77% | 71% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 9% |
| With Kids | 48% | 41% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 35 |
| Rentals | 46% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Porterville or San Marcos?
A: Porterville has a smaller population count than San Marcos: 58782 compared with 93493 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Porterville or in San Marcos?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Porterville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Porterville or San Marcos?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Porterville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Porterville versus 38% for San Marcos.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Porterville may include: Calexico, Sanger, and Tulare.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z