Compare-Cities.com
Compare Porterville to San Fernando
This post compares Porterville, California to San Fernando, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Porterville (city) | San Fernando (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,782 | 24,581 |
| Income (median) | $36,312 | $37,371 |
| Home Value (median) | $163,100 | $370,300 |
| White | 77% | 57% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 1% |
| With Kids | 48% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 33 |
| Rentals | 46% | 45% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Porterville or San Fernando?
A: Porterville has a larger population count than San Fernando: 58782 compared with 24581 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Porterville or in San Fernando?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Porterville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Porterville or San Fernando?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Porterville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Porterville versus 45% for San Fernando.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Porterville may include: Calexico, Sanger, and Tulare.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z