Compare-Cities.com
Compare Porterville to Riverbank
This post compares Porterville, California to Riverbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Porterville (city) | Riverbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,782 | 24,047 |
| Income (median) | $36,312 | $42,277 |
| Home Value (median) | $163,100 | $247,200 |
| White | 77% | 79% |
| Black | 0% | 0% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 48% | 46% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 32 |
| Rentals | 46% | 32% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Porterville or Riverbank?
A: Porterville has a larger population count than Riverbank: 58782 compared with 24047 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Porterville or in Riverbank?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Porterville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Porterville or Riverbank?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Porterville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Porterville versus 32% for Riverbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Porterville may include: Calexico, Sanger, and Tulare.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z