Compare-Cities.com
Compare Porterville to Rancho Cucamonga
This post compares Porterville, California to Rancho Cucamonga, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Porterville (city) | Rancho Cucamonga (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,782 | 174,573 |
| Income (median) | $36,312 | $56,814 |
| Home Value (median) | $163,100 | $444,200 |
| White | 77% | 62% |
| Black | 0% | 9% |
| Asian | 4% | 13% |
| With Kids | 48% | 39% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 35 |
| Rentals | 46% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Porterville or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Porterville has a much smaller population count than Rancho Cucamonga: 58782 compared with 174573 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Porterville or in Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Porterville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Porterville or Rancho Cucamonga?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Porterville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Porterville versus 38% for Rancho Cucamonga.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Porterville may include: Calexico, Sanger, and Tulare.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z