Compare-Cities.com
Compare Porterville to Pleasant Hill
This post compares Porterville, California to Pleasant Hill, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Porterville (city) | Pleasant Hill (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 58,782 | 34,662 |
Income (median) | $36,312 | $77,000 |
Home Value (median) | $163,100 | $633,400 |
White | 77% | 75% |
Black | 0% | 1% |
Asian | 4% | 13% |
With Kids | 48% | 29% |
Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
Rentals | 46% | 39% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Porterville or Pleasant Hill?
A: Porterville has a larger population count than Pleasant Hill: 58782 compared with 34662 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Porterville or in Pleasant Hill?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Porterville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Porterville or Pleasant Hill?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Porterville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Porterville versus 39% for Pleasant Hill.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Porterville may include: Calexico, Sanger, and Tulare.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z