Compare-Cities.com
Compare Porterville to Palm Springs
This post compares Porterville, California to Palm Springs, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Porterville (city) | Palm Springs (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,782 | 47,140 |
| Income (median) | $36,312 | $45,934 |
| Home Value (median) | $163,100 | $340,600 |
| White | 77% | 83% |
| Black | 0% | 4% |
| Asian | 4% | 4% |
| With Kids | 48% | 12% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 54 |
| Rentals | 46% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Porterville or Palm Springs?
A: Porterville has a similar population count than Palm Springs: 58782 compared with 47140 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Porterville or in Palm Springs?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Porterville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Porterville or Palm Springs?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Porterville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Porterville versus 41% for Palm Springs.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Porterville may include: Calexico, Sanger, and Tulare.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z