Compare-Cities.com
Compare Porterville to Foster City
This post compares Porterville, California to Foster City, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Porterville (city) | Foster City (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,782 | 33,529 |
| Income (median) | $36,312 | $105,889 |
| Home Value (median) | $163,100 | $1,051,000 |
| White | 77% | 43% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 47% |
| With Kids | 48% | 33% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 40 |
| Rentals | 46% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Porterville or Foster City?
A: Porterville has a larger population count than Foster City: 58782 compared with 33529 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Porterville or in Foster City?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Porterville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Porterville or Foster City?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Porterville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Porterville versus 41% for Foster City.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Porterville may include: Calexico, Sanger, and Tulare.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z