Compare-Cities.com
Compare Porterville to Foothill Farms
This post compares Porterville, California to Foothill Farms, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Porterville (city) | Foothill Farms (CDP) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,782 | 33,627 |
| Income (median) | $36,312 | $39,925 |
| Home Value (median) | $163,100 | $201,200 |
| White | 77% | 67% |
| Black | 0% | 9% |
| Asian | 4% | 5% |
| With Kids | 48% | 38% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 33 |
| Rentals | 46% | 48% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Porterville or Foothill Farms?
A: Porterville has a larger population count than Foothill Farms: 58782 compared with 33627 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Porterville or in Foothill Farms?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Porterville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Porterville or Foothill Farms?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Porterville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Foothill Farms does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 46% for Porterville versus 48% for Foothill Farms.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Porterville may include: Calexico, Sanger, and Tulare.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z