Compare-Cities.com
Compare Porterville to Corona
This post compares Porterville, California to Corona, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Porterville (city) | Corona (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,782 | 163,585 |
| Income (median) | $36,312 | $50,094 |
| Home Value (median) | $163,100 | $411,600 |
| White | 77% | 66% |
| Black | 0% | 5% |
| Asian | 4% | 11% |
| With Kids | 48% | 40% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 34 |
| Rentals | 46% | 35% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Porterville or Corona?
A: Porterville has a much smaller population count than Corona: 58782 compared with 163585 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Porterville or in Corona?
A: Incomes are on average lower in Porterville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Porterville or Corona?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Porterville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Porterville does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Porterville versus 35% for Corona.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Porterville may include: Calexico, Sanger, and Tulare.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z