Compare-Cities.com
Compare Porterville to Burbank
This post compares Porterville, California to Burbank, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Porterville (city) | Burbank (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,782 | 104,765 |
| Income (median) | $36,312 | $57,804 |
| Home Value (median) | $163,100 | $574,300 |
| White | 77% | 70% |
| Black | 0% | 2% |
| Asian | 4% | 11% |
| With Kids | 48% | 27% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 39 |
| Rentals | 46% | 57% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Porterville or Burbank?
A: Porterville has a smaller population count than Burbank: 58782 compared with 104765 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Porterville or in Burbank?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Porterville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Porterville or Burbank?
A: Homes tend to be much less expensive in Porterville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Burbank does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Porterville versus 57% for Burbank.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Porterville may include: Calexico, Sanger, and Tulare.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z