Compare-Cities.com
Compare Porterville to Beverly Hills
This post compares Porterville, California to Beverly Hills, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Porterville (city) | Beverly Hills (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 58,782 | 34,506 |
| Income (median) | $36,312 | $82,377 |
| Home Value (median) | $163,100 | $2,000,000+ |
| White | 77% | 82% |
| Black | 0% | 1% |
| Asian | 4% | 9% |
| With Kids | 48% | 24% |
| Age (median) | 30 | 43 |
| Rentals | 46% | 58% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Porterville or Beverly Hills?
A: Porterville has a larger population count than Beverly Hills: 58782 compared with 34506 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Porterville or in Beverly Hills?
A: Incomes are on average much lower in Porterville.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Porterville or Beverly Hills?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Porterville.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Beverly Hills does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 46% for Porterville versus 58% for Beverly Hills.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Porterville may include: Calexico, Sanger, and Tulare.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z