Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pleasanton to South San Francisco
This post compares Pleasanton, California to South San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pleasanton (city) | South San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,341 | 67,120 |
| Income (median) | $102,827 | $52,696 |
| Home Value (median) | $879,800 | $697,400 |
| White | 59% | 33% |
| Black | 2% | 2% |
| Asian | 31% | 39% |
| With Kids | 41% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 39 |
| Rentals | 30% | 38% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pleasanton or South San Francisco?
A: Pleasanton has a similar population count than South San Francisco: 79341 compared with 67120 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pleasanton or in South San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pleasanton.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pleasanton or South San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pleasanton.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Pleasanton versus 38% for South San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pleasanton may include: Belmont, Dublin, and San-Ramon.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z