Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pleasanton to South Pasadena
This post compares Pleasanton, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pleasanton (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,341 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $102,827 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $879,800 | $928,500 |
| White | 59% | 54% |
| Black | 2% | 3% |
| Asian | 31% | 29% |
| With Kids | 41% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 40 |
| Rentals | 30% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pleasanton or South Pasadena?
A: Pleasanton has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 79341 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pleasanton or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pleasanton.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pleasanton or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be similarly priced in Pleasanton.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Pleasanton versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pleasanton may include: Belmont, Dublin, and San-Ramon.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z