Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pleasanton to Sanger
This post compares Pleasanton, California to Sanger, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pleasanton (city) | Sanger (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,341 | 24,883 |
| Income (median) | $102,827 | $35,793 |
| Home Value (median) | $879,800 | $178,900 |
| White | 59% | 77% |
| Black | 2% | 0% |
| Asian | 31% | 2% |
| With Kids | 41% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 32 |
| Rentals | 30% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pleasanton or Sanger?
A: Pleasanton has a larger population count than Sanger: 79341 compared with 24883 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pleasanton or in Sanger?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pleasanton.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pleasanton or Sanger?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pleasanton.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sanger does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Pleasanton versus 42% for Sanger.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pleasanton may include: Belmont, Dublin, and San-Ramon.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z