Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pleasanton to Pasadena
This post compares Pleasanton, California to Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pleasanton (city) | Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 79,341 | 141,231 |
| Income (median) | $102,827 | $59,401 |
| Home Value (median) | $879,800 | $689,700 |
| White | 59% | 53% |
| Black | 2% | 10% |
| Asian | 31% | 16% |
| With Kids | 41% | 25% |
| Age (median) | 42 | 37 |
| Rentals | 30% | 56% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pleasanton or Pasadena?
A: Pleasanton has a smaller population count than Pasadena: 79341 compared with 141231 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pleasanton or in Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pleasanton.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pleasanton or Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be more expensive in Pleasanton.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 30% for Pleasanton versus 56% for Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pleasanton may include: Belmont, Dublin, and San-Ramon.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z