Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pleasant Hill to South Pasadena
This post compares Pleasant Hill, California to South Pasadena, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pleasant Hill (city) | South Pasadena (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,662 | 25,974 |
| Income (median) | $77,000 | $74,034 |
| Home Value (median) | $633,400 | $928,500 |
| White | 75% | 54% |
| Black | 1% | 3% |
| Asian | 13% | 29% |
| With Kids | 29% | 34% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 40 |
| Rentals | 39% | 54% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pleasant Hill or South Pasadena?
A: Pleasant Hill has a larger population count than South Pasadena: 34662 compared with 25974 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pleasant Hill or in South Pasadena?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pleasant Hill or South Pasadena?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: South Pasadena does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 39% for Pleasant Hill versus 54% for South Pasadena.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pleasant Hill may include: Claremont, Camarillo, and Huntington-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z