Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pleasant Hill to Selma
This post compares Pleasant Hill, California to Selma, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
Dimension | Pleasant Hill (city) | Selma (city) |
---|---|---|
Population | 34,662 | 24,537 |
Income (median) | $77,000 | $35,716 |
Home Value (median) | $633,400 | $171,200 |
White | 75% | 78% |
Black | 1% | 0% |
Asian | 13% | 4% |
With Kids | 29% | 54% |
Age (median) | 39 | 30 |
Rentals | 39% | 41% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pleasant Hill or Selma?
A: Pleasant Hill has a larger population count than Selma: 34662 compared with 24537 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pleasant Hill or in Selma?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pleasant Hill or Selma?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Selma does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 39% for Pleasant Hill versus 41% for Selma.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pleasant Hill may include: Claremont, Camarillo, and Huntington-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z