Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pleasant Hill to Sanger
This post compares Pleasant Hill, California to Sanger, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pleasant Hill (city) | Sanger (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,662 | 24,883 |
| Income (median) | $77,000 | $35,793 |
| Home Value (median) | $633,400 | $178,900 |
| White | 75% | 77% |
| Black | 1% | 0% |
| Asian | 13% | 2% |
| With Kids | 29% | 49% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 32 |
| Rentals | 39% | 42% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pleasant Hill or Sanger?
A: Pleasant Hill has a larger population count than Sanger: 34662 compared with 24883 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pleasant Hill or in Sanger?
A: Incomes are on average much higher in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pleasant Hill or Sanger?
A: Homes tend to be much more expensive in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: Sanger does. The percentage of rentals is quite similar: 39% for Pleasant Hill versus 42% for Sanger.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pleasant Hill may include: Claremont, Camarillo, and Huntington-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z