Compare-Cities.com
Compare Pleasant Hill to San Francisco
This post compares Pleasant Hill, California to San Francisco, California across various dimensions, including population, median income, median age, percentage of housing that is rental, percent of households with kids, and other demographics.
| Dimension | Pleasant Hill (city) | San Francisco (city) |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,662 | 864,263 |
| Income (median) | $77,000 | $74,841 |
| Home Value (median) | $633,400 | $927,400 |
| White | 75% | 47% |
| Black | 1% | 5% |
| Asian | 13% | 34% |
| With Kids | 29% | 18% |
| Age (median) | 39 | 38 |
| Rentals | 39% | 62% |
Questions and Answers:
Q: Which is more populated, Pleasant Hill or San Francisco?
A: Pleasant Hill has a much smaller population count than San Francisco: 34662 compared with 864263 total people.
Q: Do incomes tend to be higher in Pleasant Hill or in San Francisco?
A: Incomes are on average similar in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Are homes more expensive in Pleasant Hill or San Francisco?
A: Homes tend to be less expensive in Pleasant Hill.
Q: Which has a higher percentage of housing rental units?
A: San Francisco does. The percentage of rentals differs quite a bit: 39% for Pleasant Hill versus 62% for San Francisco.
Somewhat similar in-state cities, towns, and CDPs to Pleasant Hill may include: Claremont, Camarillo, and Huntington-Beach.
The statistics and analyses on this page are based on data from the U.S. Census American Community Survey.
City first letter menu:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z